
Planning could come in many levels when talking about an Architectural design; it involves the planning of site, the planning of spaces and the planning of levels. It is these planning that allow a building to be built. Just as Le Corbusier has mentioned “the plan is the generator”, without the plan building cannot be generated.
In looking at planning for our group fabrication project, we have to first determine our group’s goal which is to match the falling water model, or surpass the falling water model if time permits.
To accomplish this goal, our strategy was to do a SWOT Analysis to determine our strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
Strength – knowledge in 3dmax. Build on our strength we decided to do the all the modelling and mapping of the house in 3dmax.
Weakness – limited knowledge in UT3. Technical problems such as importing the model into UT3. In resolving our weakness we have allocated the 4 initial weeks to learn UT3 for all the group members. And about 3 weeks for testing and trial any technical problems e.g. importing issues and will also allocated to learn more advance knowledge in UT3, to create a highly interactive environment.
Opportunities – Tutors and other group members. Exploit our opportunities; ask for technical help from tutors and other groups.
Threat – Assignments in other courses. To avoid our threats we have to manage our time, allocate time correctly to do other assignments.[1]
After analysing SWOT an action plan is developed, it outline what needs to be done, by whom and when.[2] This action plan is scope to a 14 weeks period. The action plan will help to clarify the group plans and ensure every members are directed to know what to do and by when. It’s a good strategy to allocate the group resources (people and time). Below is an action plan I’ve developed to assist us in accomplishing our group’s goals.
Fabrication Task Action Plan:
What | Who | When |
Learning UT3, Modelling and Mapping in 3dmax | ||
Learning UT3 | Cettina Mangano, Jeffrey Aguas, Azize Ceylan, Rachel MacKenzie & Chivonda Lam | Week 2-5 |
Modelling the house in 3dmax | Azize Ceylan | Week 6 |
Importing trial | Azize Ceylan | Week 7-8 |
Modelling of components e.g. railings, doors and windows 3dmax | Rachel MacKenzie, Azize Ceylan & Chivonda Lam | Week 9 |
Textures and mappings on the house in 3dmax | Rachel MacKenzie & Chivonda Lam | Week 10-11 |
Furnitures and fittings in 3dmax | Cettina Mangano | Week 10-11 |
Textures and mappings on Furnitures and fittings in 3dmax | Cettina Mangano | Week 12 |
Start UT3 work | ||
Terrain in UT3 | Jeffrey Aguas | Week 9-11 |
Components in Terrain
| Jeffrey Aguas | Week 12 |
Import model, textures, furniture and fitting on to the terrain | Azize Ceylan | Week 12 |
Interactive environment trial– using UT3 CD tutorials | Rachel MacKenzie, Chivonda Lam, Azize Ceylan, Jeffrey Aguas & Cettina Mangano | Week 12 |
Add interactive environment, might require programming
| Jeffrey Aguas, Rachel MacKenzie & Chivonda Lam | Week 13 |
GOAL 1 REACHED - Match Falling Water Model | ||
Make the environment highly interactive
| Rachel MacKenzie, Chivonda Lam, Azize Ceylan, Jeffrey Aguas & Cettina Mangano | Week 14 |
GOAL 2 REACHED - Surpass Falling Water Model | ||
The above plan will be revised weekly to alter any task reallocation.
__________________________
[1] Invest-Tech Ltd, “Developing a strategic Plan”, PlanWare, (2008), http://www.planware.org/strategicplan.htm#5, (viewed 24 May 2008).
[2] Ibid.
1 comment:
according to your timetable layout...question; did you set one up in the beginning and if so, did it match to what was actually done?
my experience is these timetable are great if you include outside factors --like other assignments and social life-- it would be interesting to see something planned from the beginning compared to the reality of it being completed
Post a Comment